Year Field in Tree View

[gt]

Hey guys,

I was thinking about the positioning of the year field in the tree view.
Wouldn't it be better if it's positioned next to the Album name.

Maybe something like:

------------------------------
Artist Track
Album1 (year) | 1.
Album2 (year) | 2.
... | ...
------------------------------

Currently the albums are sorted according to year (which is great), but we
have to expand each album to see the actual year. Having it next
to the album name will make it much more easier to look at the year.

What do you people think?

[Vladimir Todorov]

actually i was thinking the same thing... :)

Post by gt
Hey guys,
I was thinking about the positioning of the year field in the tree view.
Wouldn't it be better if it's positioned next to the Album name.
------------------------------
Artist Track
Album1 (year) | 1.
Album2 (year) | 2.
... | ...
------------------------------
Currently the albums are sorted according to year (which is great), but we
have to expand each album to see the actual year. Having it next
to the album name will make it much more easier to look at the year.
What do you people think?
--
O< ascii ribbon campaign - stop html mail - www.asciiribbon.org

[Gregory Petrosyan]

Post by gt
I was thinking about the positioning of the year field in the tree view.
Wouldn't it be better if it's positioned next to the Album name.
------------------------------
Artist Track
Album1 (year) | 1.
Album2 (year) | 2.
... | ...
------------------------------
Currently the albums are sorted according to year (which is great), but we
have to expand each album to see the actual year. Having it next
to the album name will make it much more easier to look at the year.
What do you people think?

This can be good for big windows and collections with proper tags, but it will
waste screen space in case of small terminal windows, and make less than ideal
collections look quite bad, I think.

Gregory

[Vladimir Todorov]

Can it be configurable?

On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Gregory Petrosyan <

Post by Gregory Petrosyan

Post by gt
I was thinking about the positioning of the year field in the tree view.
Wouldn't it be better if it's positioned next to the Album name.
------------------------------
Artist Track
Album1 (year) | 1.
Album2 (year) | 2.
... | ...
------------------------------
Currently the albums are sorted according to year (which is great), but

we

Post by gt
have to expand each album to see the actual year. Having it next
to the album name will make it much more easier to look at the year.
What do you people think?

This can be good for big windows and collections with proper tags, but it will
waste screen space in case of small terminal windows, and make less than ideal
collections look quite bad, I think.
Gregory
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a
definitive record of customers, application performance, security
threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1

[gt]

Post by Gregory Petrosyan
This can be good for big windows and collections with proper tags, but it will
waste screen space in case of small terminal windows, and make less than ideal
collections look quite bad, I think.

Hmm.. I think you are right. In case of long album names too, it'll be
problamatic. I have a few of those, and their names get truncated, near
the vertical divider. If only the tree view was configurable..

Post by Gregory Petrosyan
Can it be configurable?

No, the tree view isn't configurable, it's hard coded.